April 19, 2024 09:14 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Maldives opposition demands President Muizzu's impeachment over leaked reports alleging corruption by him | AAP claims conspiracy to kill Arvind Kejriwal after mango eating row | India successfully tests Indigenous Technology Subsonic Cruise Missile | Telangana missionary school vandalised after students questioned over saffron attire | Shilpa Shetty's husband Raj Kundra's properties attached by ED in Bitcoin scam
Political leaders in Nepal slam KP Sharma Oli over Lord Rama remarks

Political leaders in Nepal slam KP Sharma Oli over Lord Rama remarks

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 15 Jul 2020, 07:17 pm

Kathmandu: Nepal PM KP Sharma Oli's remark on Ayodhya and Lord Rama has earned criticisms from different political leaders of the Himalayan country.

Nepal's former PM Baburam Bhattarai tweeted: "PM Oli's statements have crossed the limit. Extremism only creates trouble."

Co-chairperson of Rastriya Prajatantra Party Kamal Thapa was quoted as saying by The Himalayan Times that it is not suitable for such baseless, unproven statements to come from a Prime  Minister. 

Senior leader of the ruling Communist Party of Nepal (NCP) Bam Dev Gautam asked the PM to withdraw the remark.

Meanwhile, Kathmandu has issued a statement to cover up Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's bizarre claim that Hindu deity Ram was not born in India but in Nepal and his birthplace Ayodhya was actually located in the Himalayan kingdom and not in Indian state Uttar Pradesh, as believed.

A day after the statement, Nepal’s foreign ministry said Oli’s remarks were not political and not meant to show contempt to Ayodhya and lower its significance.

“Remarks made by the prime minister are not linked to any political subject and have no intention to hurt the feelings and sentiments of anyone,” the Nepal foreign ministry’s statement said, adding that “the remarks were not meant to debasing the significance of Ayodhya and the cultural value it bears”.

Oli's claims on Lord Ram and Ayodhya were seen as the continuation of his attempt to slight New Delhi.

India is manipulating cultural and historical facts by creating a fake Ayodhya in the country, which in fact is a village located west of Birgunj, he had said on the birth anniversary of great Nepalese poet Adikavi Bhanu Bhakta Acharya, the author of the Ramayana in Nepali language.

“We did not give Sita, who was born in Janakpur, to an Indian prince but Sita was married to Ram of Ayodhya, not of India,” the PM was quoted as saying by The Himalayan Times, adding that Ayodhya was later created in India encroaching upon facts.

Oli ‘reasoned’ that a prince from a place that far away could not possibly come to Janakpur to marry Sita as there were no means of communication and easy transportation during those times.

“There is a huge controversy in ‘their’ Ayodhya while our Ayodhya, that lies in the Thori village, has no issues as such,” he was quoted as saying by the newspaper.

He did not provide any Archaeological evidence or cite references to back his statement.

Meanwhile, seers in Ayodhya called his remark as 'insane'.

Hitting out at the Nepalese PM, Ram Temple Trust member, Mahant Dinendra Das was quoted as saying by Times Now, "Lord Rama was born here. He was born here in Ayodhya near Sarayu river. It is a popular belief that he belongs to Ayodhya. It is true that Sita Ji (Lord Rama's wife) was from Nepal, but to claim that Lord Rama was Nepali is wrong. I condemn Oli's statement."

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.