April 18, 2024 20:49 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Telangana missionary school vandalised after students questioned over saffron attire | Shilpa Shetty's husband Raj Kundra's properties attached by ED in Bitcoin scam | 'Daydreaming': Ravi Shankar Prasad on Rahul Gandhi's claim that BJP won't cross 150 seats | US reacts to Elon Musk's X post on India's permanent UNSC seat | 10 dead as car rams into truck on Ahmedabad-Vadodara expressway in Gujarat
My family descended from Lord Ram's son Khush: BJP MP Diya Kumari
Diya Kumari Twitter page

My family descended from Lord Ram's son Khush: BJP MP Diya Kumari

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 12 Aug 2019, 04:06 am

New Delhi, Aug 12 (IBNS): BJP MP Diya Kumari has claimed that her family descended from Lord Ram's son Khush.

She made the claims just days after the Supreme Court asked if someone is still residing in Ayodhya who is belonging to the ''Raghuvansha''.

Kumari said descendants of Lord Ram are present all over the world.

"Yes, Descendants of Lord Ram are all over the world, including our family who descended from his son Kush," she tweeted.

Diya Kumari is a member of the erstwhile Jaipur royal family.

She is a BJP MP from Rajsamand. 

Supreme Court and Ayodhya Issue:

After the three-member mediation panel failed to resolve the politically-sensitive Ayodhya issue, the Supreme Court on Tuesday began its day-to-day hearing on the case pertaining to whether Ram temple can be built in the disputed land of Uttar Pradesh's Ayodhya where Babri Masjid stood till 1992.

Spiritual leader Sri Sri Ravishankar, senior lawyer Sriram Panchu and Justice FMI Kalifullah were named as the mediators by the top court.

What happened in Ayodhya and why the case is significant?

In 1992, the disputed Babri Masjid structure was brought down by several right-wing volunteers who believe Lord Ram was born on that site.

On September 27, the apex court had refused to re-visit its 1994 verdict which had stated mosque was not important for Muslims to offer prayers, paving way for the hearing of the Ayodhya case.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.