April 20, 2026 07:49 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Pushback from smartphone makers: Centre drops Aadhaar app pre-install plan — report | Meta eyes first wave of layoffs on May 20: Report | TCS breaks silence on Nida Khan: ‘No HR role, no power’ in Nashik case | ‘Panic reaction’: Rahul Gandhi on women’s bill, says PM Modi ‘wants to send a message’ | Adani Group shares rise as Gautam Adani becomes Asia’s richest, overtakes Mukesh Ambani | TCS Nashik ‘conversion’ case accused seeks anticipatory bail citing pregnancy | IT raids TMC candidate Debasish Kumar’s premises ahead of Bengal polls | Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls
COVID-19 | PCR Test
Image credit: Unsplash

Scientists propose cheaper mass PCR testing method sans kits: COVID Research

| @indiablooms | Dec 03, 2021, at 01:26 am

London/UNI/Sputnik: A group of Singaporean and British scientists has proposed a scalable cheap alternative to the existing PCR testing method using kits to increase the availability of timely and uninterrupted COVID testing in lower income countries, according to research published in the journal 'Nature'.

The aim of the research was to demonstrate how a kit-less method of PCR testing can be widely applied using hospital and laboratory infrastructure already in place.

Its adoption will ensure that mass testing in future epidemics will not be compromised by the unavailability or unaffordability of RNA extraction kits needed for tests, which are currently patented and supplied by a handful of major manufacturers.

To avoid shortages of PCR testing kits, essential for diagnosing viral diseases such as the arboviruses, hepatitis viruses and HIV, the technology has to be readily available to generic suppliers and local laboratories.

"Here we demonstrate that a well-established, TRIzol-based, non-kit RNA extraction protocol can be adapted into a semi-automated, high-throughput format using equipment readily available in research and hospital laboratories," the research said.

Biological samples are placed into a PCR plate, where the RNA is automatically extracted by liquid handlers using a modified TRIzol-based method, after which a standard qPCR-based detection is used to analyze the virus. A complete run of 96 samples takes four hours, according to the study.

The cost per one sample was estimated at a range from $5 to $16, depending on local prices for materials.

In comparison, the majority of coronavirus tests currently available on the market can cost from $50 to over $1,000, depending on the country and the time until results are ready.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.