December 09, 2025 02:43 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Race against time! Indian Navy sends four more warships to Cyclone Ditwah-hit Sri Lanka | $2 billion mega deal! HD Hyundai to build shipyard in Tamil Nadu — a game changer for India | After 8 years of legal drama, Malayalam actor Dileep acquitted in 2017 rape case — what really happened? | Centre imposes temporary fare caps as ticket prices defy gravity amid IndiGo meltdown | 'Action is coming': Aviation Minister blames IndiGo for countrywide air travel chaos | In front of Putin, PM Modi makes bold statement on Russia-Ukraine war: ‘India is not neutral, we side with peace!’ | Rupee weakens following RBI repo rate cut | RBI slashes repo rate by 25 basis points — big relief coming for borrowers! | 'Mamata fooled Muslims': Humayun Kabir explodes after TMC suspends him over 'Babri Masjid-style mosque' demand; announces new party | Mosque in the middle of Kolkata airport? Centre confirms flight risks, BJP fires at Mamata
AstraZeneca
Image: @UNICEF Benin

COVID-19: AstraZeneca vaccine benefits still ‘largely positive’

| @indiablooms | Apr 07, 2021, at 10:26 pm

New York: The benefits of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine are still “largely positive” and outweigh risk of rare but serious blood clots, according to an official with the World Health Organization (WHO), speaking on Tuesday during the agency’s regular press briefing from Geneva.

Dr Rogério  Pinto de Sá Gaspar, Director for Regulation and Prequalification, was responding to a journalist’s question regarding links between the vaccine and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, a rare blood clotting syndrome.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) on Tuesday denied that it had established any link, following reports that one of its experts stated there was a connection. 

Expert meetings underway

Meanwhile, an EMA committee that monitors the safety of medicines has been meeting to assess the data, which is also being reviewed by a regulatory body in the United Kingdom.  WHO is following both proceedings.

“What we can say is that the appraisal that we have for the moment, and this is under consideration by the experts, is that the benefit risk assessment for the vaccine is still largely positive”, said Dr Pinto de Sá Gaspar.

He reported that “thrombolytic events” are rare, and are now being categorized in terms of their distribution within the population.

“For the time being, there is no evidence that the benefit risk assessment for the vaccine needs to be changed”, he added. “And we know from the  data coming from countries like the UK and others, that the benefits are really important in terms of reduction of the mortality of populations that are being vaccinated.”

WHO’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety is due to meet on Wednesday, which also will look at the data, with a conclusion expected later in the week.

Stigma and virus variants

WHO continues to work with a group of scientists worldwide to develop nomenclature for variants of the new coronavirus that causes COVID-19.

Many people, including health experts, have been referring to the variants by the countries in which they were first detected, something the UN agency wants to change.

“We need to make sure that any of the names that are used do not further stigmatize a person, or a last name, or a location, inadvertently”, said Dr Maria Van Kerhove, WHO technical lead on COVID-19, responding to a question from a South African journalist.

“There should be no stigma associated with these viruses being detected, and unfortunately we still see that happening.” 

Currently there are three variants: B117, first identified in the UK; B 1.351, which was first identified in South Africa, and P1, a variant first detected in Japan but circulating in Brazil.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.