August 25, 2026 11:19 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Reservation for poor, not caste’: Stir at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar | Dalit woman 'gangrape-murder' shocker in Karnataka: 4 arrested after body found in well | India dismisses Pakistan's 'frustration' over US envoy's J&K remark | Centre denies US visit clearance to Telangana CM Revanth Reddy, says programmes 'not appropriate' | Delhi Police register FIR in pellet gun case after Rahul Gandhi's sit-in | Rahul Gandhi stages dharna at Delhi police station over CJP protest crackdown, targets Amit Shah | CJP school tour turns chaotic in Jaipur: Cars vandalised, stones pelted as Ashutosh Ranka alleges BJP ‘goons’ attack | Vande Mataram row: Kangana Ranaut slams Sharmila Tagore, says ‘come out of Hindu-Muslim mindset’ | Jadavpur erupts again: ABVP-SFI clash, police barricades shattered as fresh tension grips area | Ex-Congress MP and 1984 anti-Sikh riots convict Sajjan Kumar dies while serving life sentence
Google
Image Credit: Pixabay

Android case: SC refuses to modify NCLAT's order upholding CCI's penalty on Google

| @indiablooms | Feb 11, 2023, at 03:43 am

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday rejected Google’s plea to modify its January 19 order in a case of unfair and anti-competitive practices related to Android devices, media reports said.

On January 19, the SC didn’t grant interim relief to the tech giant against NCLAT order upholding the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI's) penalty of Rs 1,337.76 crore pertaining to the allegations of unfair and anti-competitive practices related to Android devices.

A Supreme Court bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala said the bench can at the most add "without prejudice" in the January 19 order and nothing more.

The bench said the company can raise its grievances during the hearing of its appeal before the NCLAT.

Google’s counsel senior advocate said some portion of the January 19 order needs to be deleted.

However, the court said it wouldn’t order a deletion of any part of the judgment and asked the company to raise all these grievances during the hearing of the appeals.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.