February 28, 2024 16:58 (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Calcutta HC grants bail to ex-Sandeshkhali CPI(M) MLA Nirapada Sardar, raps govt over his arrest | ‘Our MSMEs have great opportunity to be part of global supply chain', says PM Modi | Indian-origin author Nitasha Kaul, who was deported over 'anti-India views', claims 'all lies' | 'How will retired district judges survive': Supreme Court questions Centre on pension amount | Cross-border terrorism emerging from Pakistan being given befitting response: S Jaishankar
SEBI directs Edelweiss Broking to be more cautious in reporting suspicious transactions Edelweiss Broking
Image Credit: wikipedia.org

SEBI directs Edelweiss Broking to be more cautious in reporting suspicious transactions

India Blooms News Service | @indiablooms | 20 Jun 2023, 08:44 pm

Mumbai: Stock market regulator Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has instructed Edelweiss Broking to be more cautious when reporting suspicious transactions, Moneycontrol reported.

The directive comes after an investigation into the broker's adherence to professional standards and diligence in verifying client identities, as well as reporting any suspicious activities to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

The stock market watchdog conducted an investigation into the unauthorised transfer of shares from dormant accounts to accounts held by fictitious entities.

The transactions under scrutiny occurred between September 14, 2009, and March 8, 2013.

According to the investigators, Edelweiss Broking was accused of not exercising diligence and professionalism in verifying the identity of an individual named Yatin Vasantrai Parekh.

Further, the investigators found that the broker had neglected to report Parekh's transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), despite the fact that they were inconsistent with his declared annual income.

In response to the investigation, a designated authority (DA) appointed by SEBI submitted a report stating that the investigators were unable to provide sufficient evidence to support the claim that the broker had neglected to verify the client's identity properly.

However, the DA acknowledged that the broker had indeed failed to report suspicious transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), supporting the second allegation made against it.

This failure to report was considered a violation of regulations for brokers.

“The DA has found that by not adhering to the ‘SEBI PML Circulars’, the noticee failed to exercise due care and diligence, professionalism in the conduct of its business,” the order, signed by the Executive Director (ED) of Sebi, stated.

The designated authority (DA) recommended a three-month suspension of the brokerage's certificate of registration as a consequence.

Subsequently, the broker received a show-cause notice, requiring them to present reasons why the recommended action should not be taken.

After considering the broker's defence, the market regulator issued a new order. In this order, the market regulator's Enforcement Director (ED) agreed with the DA's assessment that the broker had exercised adequate diligence and professionalism in verifying the client's identity.

However, regarding the reporting of suspicious transactions, the ED determined that Edelweiss Broking had violated Sebi's prevention of money laundering (PML) circular.

“It is clear that the circumstances under which Mr. Parekh executed his transactions would have led any person of ordinary prudence to exercise care and diligence to report the transactions as suspicious in accordance with law,” said the order, reported Moneycontrol.

It added that by violating this circular, “the noticee has also violated Clause A(2) of the Code of Conduct as specified in Schedule II read with regulation 9(f) of the Broker Regulations which requires the noticee to exercise due skill, care and diligence in the conduct of all its business”.

However, taking into account certain mitigating factors, SEBI’s Enforcement Director (ED) disagreed with the severity of the punishment proposed by the designated authority (DA) for this particular lapse. The DA had recommended a three-month suspension of the brokerage's registration.

According to the ED, the disparity between the client's annual income and turnover was not glaring, and the number of suspicious instances was relatively small.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.