April 01, 2026 11:37 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR progress: 47 lakh of 60 lakh adjudicated cases disposed of, Supreme Court informed | Amit Shah to join Suvendu Adhikari on Bhabanipur nomination day; BJP plans mega roadshow | Fuel prices rise: Premium petrol, diesel hiked amid oil price surge | Commercial LPG up Rs 195.50 as global oil prices rise; domestic rates unchanged | Layoff alert: Oracle cuts 30,000 jobs globally, 12,000 hit in India | ‘Unsubstantial allegations’: Calcutta HC dismisses plea on ECI’s officer transfers in Bengal | Tennis icon Leander Paes joins BJP ahead of Bengal polls | 8 killed, several injured in crowd crush at Bihar temple in Nalanda | Trump signals exit from Iran war even as Strait of Hormuz remains shut: Report | Mystery death in Pakistan: JeM chief Masood Azhar’s brother found dead
USTR removes India trade post showing PoK and Aksai Chin as Indian territories.
USTR
USTR removes India trade deal post featuring map showing PoK and Aksai Chin as Indian territory. Photo: AI composition by ChatGPT

US deletes India trade deal map showing PoK, Aksai Chin as Indian territory

| @indiablooms | Feb 11, 2026, at 03:09 pm

The United States Trade Representative (USTR) has taken down a social media post announcing the India–US trade framework after it featured a map depicting the entire region of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh — including Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) and Aksai Chin — as part of India.

The now-deleted post had drawn widespread attention because the map matched India’s official cartographic position, showing the full territory as Indian.

Parts of the region are currently under the control of Pakistan and China, which claim them illegally according to New Delhi.

A departure from past US practice

The graphic was shared on February 7 as part of the announcement of the bilateral interim trade framework between Washington and New Delhi.

It illustrated India’s tariff reductions on American exports and was accompanied by a map of India that did not mark PoK or Aksai Chin as disputed areas.

Historically, maps circulated by US government agencies have shown these territories with boundary demarcations indicating their disputed status.

The absence of such markings in the USTR post marked a notable shift from long-standing American cartographic practice.

This deviation quickly sparked debate among policy observers and strategic analysts.

USTR removes India trade post showing PoK and Aksai Chin as Indian territories.The US trade office on Feb 7 posted the map on X, showing PoK and Aksai Chin as Indian territory. Photo: Screen-grab from X

Geopolitical signals or oversight?

Some experts interpreted the map as a deliberate geopolitical gesture toward India, particularly at a time when Washington’s relations with Pakistan and China remain strained.

Others suggested the depiction could have been an oversight in the design of the trade announcement graphic.

The development also came amid signs that strategic alignment between India and the United States — especially in the Indo-Pacific — had regained momentum after earlier trade tensions.

However, by removing the post entirely from its official X account, the USTR appears to have sought to end the speculation surrounding the map’s depiction.

India’s consistent position

India has consistently maintained that the entire Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, including areas currently under Pakistani and Chinese control, “has been, is and will always be an integral and inalienable part of India.”

New Delhi’s official maps reflect this claim, and Aksai Chin is regarded by India as sovereign territory despite being under Chinese administration.

The brief appearance of a US government graphic mirroring India’s official map carried diplomatic weight, even though it has now been withdrawn.

What this removal signals

While the USTR has not issued a public explanation for removing the post, the episode highlights the sensitivity surrounding territorial depictions in international diplomacy.

Cartographic representations by major powers often carry symbolic and political significance far beyond design choices.

For now, the deletion has closed one chapter of the debate, but it underscores how even a map embedded in a trade announcement can trigger wider geopolitical interpretations in an already complex regional landscape.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.