August 21, 2026 11:05 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Jadavpur erupts again: ABVP-SFI clash, police barricades shattered as fresh tension grips area | Ex-Congress MP and 1984 anti-Sikh riots convict Sajjan Kumar dies while serving life sentence | India hits back at Pakistan: Structures outside High Commission demolished in Delhi | ‘Don’t daydream about my bedroom’: Kangana Ranaut fires back at Ramdev over ‘Gen Z’ row | Jadavpur University erupts at midnight: ABVP-Left student groups clash over meeting, BJP-CPI(M) leaders trade barbs | Vijay govt calls for action to stop students, youth from joining CJP, Left protests | Kolkata hotel fire kills 9: Bengal Minister Agnimitra Paul targets ex-TMC govt, CESC over licences | Kolkata hotel fire: 9 Bangladeshi nationals, including women and a child, die in massive blaze | Tarun Tejpal faces life term? Goa govt moves Supreme Court after 2013 rape conviction | Supreme Court rejects ‘less painful’ death penalty plea, but leaves door open for future change
The US Supreme Court has struck down Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship. Photo: ChatGPT

Trump suffers setback as US Supreme Court upholds Birthright Citizenship

| @indiablooms | Jun 30, 2026, at 09:04 pm

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld the principle of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump's attempt to limit who qualifies as an American citizen at birth.

In a 6-3 ruling on the final day of its term, the court struck down an executive order signed by Trump on the first day of his second term that sought to deny automatic US citizenship to children born in the country to parents who are in the United States illegally or on temporary visas.

What the Supreme Court ruled

The decision preserves the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause, which guarantees citizenship to nearly everyone born on US soil.

The amendment states: "All persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

The ruling leaves intact the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship, marking a significant legal setback for the Trump administration's efforts to narrow automatic citizenship in the United States.

Why birthright citizenship matters

Adopted after the American Civil War, the 14th Amendment was originally intended to guarantee citizenship to formerly enslaved Black Americans.

Over the decades, however, its language has been interpreted broadly to grant citizenship to almost everyone born in the United States, regardless of their parents' immigration status.

This interpretation has remained a cornerstone of US constitutional law for more than a century.

Trump administration's argument

The Trump administration argued that the widely accepted interpretation of the Citizenship Clause was legally flawed.

It contended that children born to parents who are in the United States illegally or on temporary visas are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States and therefore should not automatically qualify for American citizenship.

The executive order formed part of Trump's broader immigration crackdown and was the first major immigration policy of his second term to receive a final ruling from the Supreme Court.

A major blow to Trump's immigration agenda

The Supreme Court's decision represents a significant setback for the Trump administration's efforts to redefine birthright citizenship through executive action.

By rejecting the order, the court reaffirmed the long-standing constitutional interpretation that has made nearly everyone born on US soil an American citizen.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.