August 17, 2026 09:24 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe
WhatsApp
Image Credit: Pixabay

WhatsApp group admin can't be held liable for offensive posts by other members : HC

| @indiablooms | Apr 27, 2021, at 05:16 am

Mumbai/IBNS: The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court has ruled that the administrator of a WhatsApp group cannot be held criminally liable for an objectionable post made by another member, according to media reports.

The ruling was issued by a Division Bench headed by Justice ZA Haq and AB Borkar while hearing a case of sexual harassment filed against a 33-year-old man.

Quashing the case, the bench noted that the administrator of a WhatsApp group has limited powers of adding or removing members from a group and does not have power to regulate or censor the content posted in the group.

The order was issued last month and its copy was made available on April 22.

According to media reports, one Kishore Tarone had approached the court seeking its directive to dispose of a case registered against him in Gondia district in 2016.

The prosecution had alleged that Tarone failed to take action against a member of his WhatsApp group who used filthy and indecent language against a woman member in the group.

It was alleged that Tarone despite being the group administrator did not remove or delete the member from the group and did not ask him to apologise.

The Bench, however, said that the crux of the matter was whether a WhatsApp group administrator can be held criminally liable for objectionable posts made by other members in the group.

It said that WhatsApp doesn't allow an administrator of a group to regulate or moderate posts in the group.

It also said that in the absence of a special penal provision creating vicarious liability, an administrator of a WhatsApp group cannot be held liable for the same.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.