April 20, 2026 06:50 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
15 killed, 20 injured as bus plunges into gorge in J&K’s Udhampur | Oil jumps over 5% as Strait of Hormuz closure fuels supply fears | Pushback from smartphone makers: Centre drops Aadhaar app pre-install plan — report | Meta eyes first wave of layoffs on May 20: Report | TCS breaks silence on Nida Khan: ‘No HR role, no power’ in Nashik case | ‘Panic reaction’: Rahul Gandhi on women’s bill, says PM Modi ‘wants to send a message’ | Adani Group shares rise as Gautam Adani becomes Asia’s richest, overtakes Mukesh Ambani | TCS Nashik ‘conversion’ case accused seeks anticipatory bail citing pregnancy | IT raids TMC candidate Debasish Kumar’s premises ahead of Bengal polls | Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote
SC

Supreme Court rejects plea against panel probing Vikas Dubey encounter

| @indiablooms | Aug 19, 2020, at 11:17 pm

New Delhi/UNI: Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed a plea seeking the removal of its retired judge, Justice BS Chauhan, from the three-member commission set up to inquire into the killing of Kanpur gangster Vikas Dubey and his aides in a police encounter.

A bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde said that there were enough safeguards to ensure fair inquiry by the judicial panel into the encounter.

The court had on August 11 reserved the judgment after hearing the arguments of Mumbai-based lawyer Ghanshyam Upadhyay and the Solicitor General Tushar Mehta on behalf of the Uttar Pradesh government.

On Mr Upadhyay's petition, the top court had earlier directed the UP government to set up a commission to probe the allegations against UP police in relation to Dubey’s killing.

On July 22, a commission was constituted with retired Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Shashi Kant Agarwal and former UP DGP KL Gupta.

Mr. Upadhyay, quoting a media report, had objected to Justice Chauhan's selection to probe the matter saying that two relatives of Justice Chauhan are leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party.

During the earlier hearing, Mr. Mehta said that the petitioner's arguments against Justice Chauhan contained derogatory materials.

The Chief Justice had also said that the bench cannot accept aspersion on a former Apex Court judge on the basis of a newspaper report.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.