April 22, 2026 08:57 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Will never forget’: Nation remembers Pahalgam victims as leaders vow strong fight against terror | 'India will never bow to any form of terror': PM Modi on Pahalgam terror attack anniversary | TCS Nashik case: No interim bail for Danish Shaikh in religious sentiments case | US woman alleges sexual assault at Karnataka homestay; owner among 2 arrested | ‘PM Modi is a terrorist’: Mallikarjun Kharge sparks row; BJP hits back | ‘What kind of order is this?’: Mamata slams ECI’s bike curbs in poll-bound Bengal, calls it ‘mischief’ | ‘90% of women can’t do politics without entering male politicians’ rooms’: Pappu Yadav sparks row; BJP targets Congress | Tim Cook to step down as Apple CEO; John Ternus named successor | 15 killed, 20 injured as bus plunges into gorge in J&K’s Udhampur | Oil jumps over 5% as Strait of Hormuz closure fuels supply fears
Amish Devgan

Supreme Court refuses to cancel FIRs against TV anchor Amish Devgan for Sufi saint remark

| @indiablooms | Dec 07, 2020, at 10:11 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to quash multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) filed against television anchor Amish Devgan for allegedly hurting religious sentiments with his remarks against a Sufi saint.

The Apex Court bench comprising Justices A M Khanwilkar and Sanjiv Khanna asserted that the journalist will get protection from any coercive action if he continues to cooperate with the probe.

The top court clubbed and transferred all the seven FIRs filed against Amish Devgan in different states, including Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, and Telangana, to Ajmer in Rajasthan.

Several police complaints and FIRs have been registered against Devgan across the country after he described the Sufi saint Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti as “attacker” and “lootera” (robber) during a debate he hosted on his show ‘Aar Par’ on June 15.

The show was debating public interest litigations (PILs) regarding the Place of Worship Special Provision Act.

Senior Advocate Sidharth Luthra, appearing for Devgan, had submitted that there was no "incitement of hate" or any attempt to "instigate a particular community against the other."

Devgan had already apologised for his remarks, terming as "inadvertent error."

"In 1 of my debates, I inadvertently referred to ‘Khilji’ as Chishti. I sincerely apologise for this grave error and the anguish it may have caused to followers of the Sufi saint Moinuddin Chisthi, whom I revere. I have in the past sought blessings at his dargah. I regret this error," he had said in a tweet.  

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.