August 17, 2026 10:39 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
After SC rebuke, BCI chief apologises to NALSAR students over enrolment freeze row | Independence Day: PM Modi’s big youth pitch— AI training, free coaching amid exam row and job concerns | ‘Shakti Ki Saptadhara’: Modi reveals 7 pillars to power India’s next leap in his I-Day speech from Red Fort | West Bengal STF arrests 3 more suspected Pakistani spies in Cooch Behar | Bengal man arrested in Bengaluru over terror links, Afghanistan travel plan | Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe
Vinod Dua

Supreme Court quashes sedition charge against journalist Vinod Dua

| @indiablooms | Jun 03, 2021, at 10:47 pm

New Delhi/UNI: The Supreme Court on Thursday cancelled a sedition case against senior journalist Vinod Dua in connection with his Youtube video criticising the government's handling of COVID-19 lockdown last year.

A bench of Justices UU Lalit and Vineet Saran quashed the First Information Report (FIR) against Mr Dua filed by Himachal Pradesh BJP’s Mahasu unit president Ajay Shyam saying a 1962 order protects every journalist from such charges.

However, the bench rejected Dua's plea for non-registration of FIR for any media personnel with 10 years experience unless cleared by an expert committee, saying it will be directly encroaching upon the legislative domain.

Image Credit: Vinod Dua Twitter

On October 6 last year, the top court had reserved the verdict on the plea after hearing arguments for Dua, the Himachal Pradesh government, and the complainant in the case.

According to the FIR filed against his YouTube program, 'Vinod Dua show', the media person was accused of spreading fake news, causing a public nuisance, printing defamatory material, and making statements amounting to public mischief under IPC sections 124A, 268, 501 and 505.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.