April 17, 2026 08:45 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Bengal SIR: Supreme Court allows voters restored by tribunal till April 21 and 27 to vote | 'Women won't spare you': PM Modi warns Opposition over resistance to quota bill | Vijay booked in 3 cases over poll code violation ahead of Tamil Nadu polls | 'Black law': Stalin burns copy of 'delimitation' bill, slams Modi govt | TCS halts Nashik BPO operations amid sexual abuse, conversion allegations | ‘We are surprised’: SC stays Pawan Khera’s bail over remarks on Himanta Biswa Sarma’s wife | Historic shift: Bihar gets first BJP CM as Samrat Choudhary takes oath | 'ECI deviated from Bihar procedure': Supreme Court raises concerns over voter deletion in Bengal SIR | Noida workers’ protest turns violent: Stones pelted, vehicles damaged over wage hike demand | Oil prices jump above $103 a barrel as US moves to block Iran-linked shipping
J&K
In image Kashmir's iconic Dal Lake/ courtesy: Pixabay

Supreme Court asks Centre to inform it of a timeframe to make J&K state again

| @indiablooms | Aug 30, 2023, at 01:50 am

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court Tuesday asked the Attorney General (AG) and Solicitor General (SG) to get instructions from the Centre if there is a timeframe to make Jammu and Kashmir a state again while hearing submissions in defence of the abolition of Article 370.

A five-judge Constitution bench, led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud, asked the AG and SG to apprise it of the timeframe it has in mind for restoration of statehood to J&K.

"Does Parliament have the power to convert an existing Indian state into a Union territory," the apex court questioned the Centre.

SG Tushar Mehta replied that the decision to make Jammu and Kashmir a Union Territory was not permanent.

"J&K would again be made a State when things will get normal," he told the court.

The Five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court is at present hearing a batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and the bifurcation of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union territories.

"It is necessary, for some time, J&K remains under the Union as a Union Territory... ultimately J&K will become a state (again)," the Solicitor General told the Supreme Court.

The court agreed with the government's submission that the J&K constitution is "subordinate" to that of the nation but seemed to disagree with the idea that erstwhile state's Constituent Assembly was, in reality, a legislative assembly capable of making laws.
 
[With UNI inputs]

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.