August 20, 2026 07:52 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Vijay govt calls for action to stop students, youth from joining CJP, Left protests | Kolkata hotel fire kills 9: Bengal Minister Agnimitra Paul targets ex-TMC govt, CESC over licences | Kolkata hotel fire: 9 Bangladeshi nationals, including women and a child, die in massive blaze | Tarun Tejpal faces life term? Goa govt moves Supreme Court after 2013 rape conviction | Supreme Court rejects ‘less painful’ death penalty plea, but leaves door open for future change | ‘Vulgarity and disgust’: DMK attacks Vijay over Trisha salute at I-Day event | ‘Take Gyanesh Kumar to the US’: Congress mocks Trump over praise for India’s voter ID system | Big relief for Imran Khan: Pakistan Supreme Court orders hospital transfer amid health fears | Trump praises India’s voter ID system, pushes SAVE America Act | Trump's shock threat to bomb Oman: US President warns ally over Iran deal and Hormuz crisis
Modi surname case
Image Credit : Facebook/ Rahul Gandhi

'Modi surname' defamation case: SC issues notice to complainant BJP leader Purnesh Modi

| @indiablooms | Jul 22, 2023, at 05:43 am

New Delhi/IBNS: The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to complainant Gujarat BJP legislator Purnesh Modi after hearing the appeal filed by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi challenging the Gujarat High Court's order declining to stay his conviction in the criminal defamation case in which he was sentenced to two years in jail by Surat court over 'Modi surname' remark.

A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Justice B R Gavai and also comprising Justice Prashant K Mishra, issued notice to the respondent, Purnesh Modi and sought his detailed response within 10 days on Rahul's appeal.

"We will issue notice, returnable in 10 days, time," the apex court said, and fixed the matter for further hearing on August 4.

During the course of the hearing, Justice Gavai, offered to recuse from the case on the ground that his father has had an association of 40 years with the Congress. He was elected with help from Congress. "My brother is in active politics. You all (parties) take a call," he added.

Senior lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Rahul, said, that's a fair comment. "We don't have an issue," he added.

He argued that Rahul has already lost 111 days as an MP from Wayanad constuency and apprehended that EC may announce bypoll soon.

"Rahul could not attend the last Parliament session and now stands to be out of the ongoing session. Please consider granting interim stay on his conviction," he said.

The Congress leader and disqualified Lok Sabha MP had on July 15 knocked on the doors of the Supreme Court challenging the Gujarat High Court's order dismissing his plea to stay his conviction in the criminal defamation case over the 'Modi surname' remark.

He had moved the top court, seeking a stay on the Gujarat HC's verdict dismissing his appeal to stay his conviction in the criminal defamation case over the 'Modi surname.'

Gujarat High Court's Single-judge Justice Hemant M Prachchhak, who had reserved the judgement on May 2, pronounced the verdict on July 7.

[With UNI inputs]

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.