February 05, 2026 02:47 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
‘Justice crying behind closed doors’: Mamata Banerjee slams ECI in Supreme Court, CJI Kant assures solution | Mummy, Papa, sorry: Three sisters jump to death after parents object to online gaming | Supreme Court raps Meta, WhatsApp: ‘Theft of private information, won’t allow its use’ | ‘Completely surrendered’: Congress slams Modi after Trump’s trade deal move | PM Modi thanks 'dear friend' Trump for tariff reduction, hails strong US–India partnership | Trump announces US–India trade deal, lowers reciprocal tariffs to 18% | After Budget mayhem, bulls return: Sensex, Nifty stage sharp recovery | Dalai Lama wins first Grammy at 90 | Firing outside Rohit Shetty’s Mumbai home: 4 arrested, Bishnoi Gang link emerges | Female suicide attackers emerge at centre of deadly BLA assaults that rocked Pakistan’s Balochistan
Image courtesy: Video grab

CRPF jawan dismissed for concealing marriage to Pakistani woman, aiding her overstay amid Indo-Pak tensions

| @indiablooms | May 03, 2025, at 11:27 pm

New Delhi: The Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) has terminated a jawan from service with immediate effect for concealing his marriage to a Pakistani citizen and knowingly allowing her to remain in India beyond the validity of her visa, media reports said.

Munir Ahmed, who was posted in Jammu and Kashmir, came under scrutiny after officials discovered he had not only kept his marriage under wraps but had also failed to report that his wife’s visa had expired, reported India Today.

Online relationship led to cross-border marriage

Ahmed had tied the knot with Minal Khan, a resident of Punjab province in Pakistan, in May 2024. The two reportedly grew close through social media and solemnised their marriage via an online nikah.

After months of delay in securing travel permissions, Khan arrived in India in March 2025 on a short-term visa.

However, the visa expired on March 22. Despite this, she continued to stay in India.

Her lawyer claimed that she had applied for a long-term visa, but authorities flagged the breach.

Following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, Khan was served a deportation notice as part of India’s wider crackdown on Pakistani nationals residing in the country.

She left Jammu and had reached the Attari-Wagah border to return to Pakistan when she secured a court order granting her temporary relief, allowing her to remain in India.

Security violation cited in probe

The CRPF launched an internal probe into Ahmed’s conduct and concluded that he had violated service conduct rules by suppressing information about his marriage and his wife’s illegal stay.

The force described the breach as a serious lapse, especially given the sensitivity of his posting and the heightened security environment.

Officials warned that the incident raised red flags over internal vigilance and the potential for security risks in cases involving foreign nationals, particularly from countries with which India shares strained relations.

Crackdown on Pakistan intensifies after Pahalgam killings

Tensions between India and Pakistan have escalated since April 22, when terrorists from across the border killed 26 civilians—mostly tourists—in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam.

The massacre has triggered a series of retaliatory steps from India, including cancellation of visas, closure of borders and airspace, suspension of trade ties, and freezing of the Indus Waters Treaty.

In this context, Ahmed’s concealment of personal information and facilitation of his Pakistani wife’s illegal stay were viewed as not only a disciplinary violation but a potential threat to national security.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.