August 15, 2026 07:36 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh | Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute
Japan
Image: IAEA/Greg Webb

Japan: IAEA monitoring treated water release from Fukushima nuclear plant

| @indiablooms | Aug 25, 2023, at 10:19 pm

Japan has begun discharging treated radioactive wastewater from the disabled Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station into the Pacific Ocean, 12 years on from the major meltdown there, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed on Thursday.

Experts from the UN nuclear watchdog were present to monitor and assess that all relevant international safety standards were applied, as part of a multiyear review of a process that could last for decades.

The decision to release the water into the sea has sparked criticism in Japan and the region.

Long-term commitment

The IAEA has been providing real-time data on the controlled release of the treated water, including on water flow rates and radiation monitoring.

“The IAEA has committed to be present before, during and after this process,” Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said in a video statement.

The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station suffered major damage during an earthquake and tsunami in March 2011. 

Since then, water has continually been pumped in to cool the plant's reactors. Groundwater also seeps into the site, and rainwater falls into the damaged reactor and turbine building.

‘Negligible radiological impact’

The water came in contact with melted fuel, fuel debris and other radioactive substances, resulting in contamination. It was treated and diluted through a filtration process called Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS) and stored in specially prepared tanks.

As of June, there were some 1,000 of these tanks holding more than a million cubic meters of treated water.

An IAEA report issued last month said Japan’s approach and activities to discharge the treated water were “consistent with relevant international safety standards”. 

Furthermore, the “controlled, gradual discharges” of the treated water would have a “negligible radiological impact” on people and the environment.

Reviews and criticism

The report was the outcome of nearly two years of work by an IAEA Task Force made up of top agency specialists advised by internationally recognised nuclear safety experts from 11 countries.

The Task Force conducted five review missions to Japan, published six technical reports, and met many times with officials from the Government and the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), the nuclear plant’s operator.

Japan’s decision to release the treated water into the sea drew criticism both at home and in some neighbouring countries, according to media reports. 

Protests have occurred there and in the Republic of Korea. 

China also announced on Thursday that it will immediately ban seafood from Japan.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.