July 23, 2026 12:37 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'We won't leave Jantar Mantar until Dharmendra Pradhan resigns': CJP draws red line | 'Don't waste our time': Supreme Court snubs plea on NEET protest crackdown | Trump's 200% tariff bomb on generic drugs: Here's how India could be hit | Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra lead Congress march to PM Modi's residence over student protest crackdown | 'We can't ignore his concerns': Delhi HC gives Sonam Wangchuk big relief, clears shift to private hospital | 'Students are being tortured': Mamata Banerjee offers to join CJP protest in Delhi | Sikkim tunnel horror: 8 dead, several feared trapped after NHPC project collapse | As NEET protests intensify, PM Modi defends govt action, calls for 'foolproof' education system | After NEET storm, Modi govt faces fresh challenge as farmers march to Delhi over India-US trade deal | Jantar Mantar reclaimed! CJP defies overnight police eviction, returns to protest site

Supreme Court to hear review petitions filed in Rafale case asap

| @indiablooms | Feb 21, 2019, at 01:08 pm

New Delhi, Feb 21 (UNI) The Supreme Court on Thursday said it will hear as soon as possible the review petitions filed in the Rafale case filed by several people.

"We will hear as soon as possible the review petitions filed in the case filed by many in the Rafale matter," the court said.

Senior lawyer Prashant Bhushan on Thursday mentioned before the top court and requested it to hear the petition seeking review of its verdict on Rafale deal.

To this, the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi said he will do something for the listing of the case as special bench is to be constituted for it.

Bhushan in his petition stated that several facts have come to light after the judgement was reserved in the matter last year, and the SC should hear the case and the judgement must be recalled.

Bhushan sought that an oral hearing in the open court to the petitioners’ should be assigned as the facts and circumstances of the case sufficiently necessitate, he said in his review petition. 

Image: UNI

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.