July 17, 2026 12:49 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Why introduce a new language in Class 9?' Supreme Court questions Centre's policy | 'Save Sonam Wangchuk's life': Delhi High Court to Centre as hunger strike enters Day 19 | Atul Kulkarni observes one-day fast in support of Sonam Wangchuk, urges Centre to initiate dialogue | Argentina stun England with late rally to storm into FIFA World Cup 2026 final | 'He could die in two days': Delhi HC plea seeks force-feeding of Sonam Wangchuk as fast enters Day 18 | 'Tonight's defeat is hard to take': Emmanuel Macron reacts after France crash out of World Cup, congratulates Spain | Spain cruise past France to storm into FIFA World Cup 2026 final with clinical 2-0 victory | Taslima Nasrin announces Kolkata return after 20 years to attend literary event at Rabindra Sadan | 'We must not watch one of our greatest minds be sacrificed': Zeenat Aman backs Sonam Wangchuk, urges govt to open dialogue | 'I don't want Phunsukh Wangdu to die': '3 Idiots' star Omi Vaidya's emotional appeal for Sonam Wangchuk
Electoral Bonds
Photo courtesy: Wikimedia Commons

Supreme Court strikes down electoral bonds scheme, calls it 'unconstitutional'

| @indiablooms | Feb 15, 2024, at 05:09 pm

New Delhi/IBNS: In a landmark verdict months ahead of the Lok Sabha elections, the Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the electoral bonds scheme calling it "unconstitutional", media reports said.

The top court said the scheme violates the Right to Information and Section 19(1)(a).

"The Electoral bonds scheme has to be struck down as unconstitutional. It violates the right to information of citizens, about possible quid pro quo," the court remarked as quoted by NDTV.

The scheme, which was introduced during the Union Budget 2017-18, is a way to fund political parties in India.

In its order, the Supreme Court acknowledged that not all donations to political parties are made to change public policies as students and daily wagers contribute too.

However, the court said the contributions made by companies are "purely business transactions" and have greater influence on political processes.

The top court said as quoted by NDTV, "Before amendment, loss making companies were not able to contribute. The amendment does not recognize the harm of allowing loss-making companies to contribute due to quid pro quo.

"The amendment to Section 182 Companies Act is manifestly arbitrary for not making distinction between loss making and profit making companies."

Ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, the primary opposition party Congress had promised to quash electoral bonds if the party was voted to power.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.