July 17, 2026 06:45 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Why introduce a new language in Class 9?' Supreme Court questions Centre's policy | 'Save Sonam Wangchuk's life': Delhi High Court to Centre as hunger strike enters Day 19 | Atul Kulkarni observes one-day fast in support of Sonam Wangchuk, urges Centre to initiate dialogue | Argentina stun England with late rally to storm into FIFA World Cup 2026 final | 'He could die in two days': Delhi HC plea seeks force-feeding of Sonam Wangchuk as fast enters Day 18 | 'Tonight's defeat is hard to take': Emmanuel Macron reacts after France crash out of World Cup, congratulates Spain | Spain cruise past France to storm into FIFA World Cup 2026 final with clinical 2-0 victory | Taslima Nasrin announces Kolkata return after 20 years to attend literary event at Rabindra Sadan | 'We must not watch one of our greatest minds be sacrificed': Zeenat Aman backs Sonam Wangchuk, urges govt to open dialogue | 'I don't want Phunsukh Wangdu to die': '3 Idiots' star Omi Vaidya's emotional appeal for Sonam Wangchuk
World Cup
Photo courtesy: Facebook/Mamata Banerjee

Mamata Banerjee says India would have won World Cup final if it had taken place in Kolkata or Mumbai

| @indiablooms | Nov 24, 2023, at 06:09 pm

Kolkata/IBNS: The politicisation of India's defeat against Australia in the Cricket World Cup 2023 final continued after West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday said the men in blue would have won the match if it was held in Kolkata or Mumbai.

The final was held at the Narendra Modi Stadium in Gujarat's Ahmedabad.

Addressing her workers at an event, Mamata said, "I still believe India would have won the final if it was played in Kolkata or Wankhede (Wankhede Stadium in Mumbai). Our players are excellent in sports but they have been made to wear saffron jerseys!

"The players were asked to wear saffron jerseys during playing days but they resisted. Still a patch of saffron colour has been used in the playing jerseys."

"Wherever the sinners will go...," the Chief Minister added.

Soon after India suffered the heartbreak in an almost deja vu of the 2003 World Cup final, Mamata's top minister and Kolkata Mayor Firhad Hakim had blamed the stadium, which is named after the Prime Minister and is located in Modi's homestate Gujarat, and its pitch.

"I think the biggest mistake was hosting the final match at the Narendra Modi Stadium. What kind of a pitch was that? The result would have been different if the match was played at Eden Gardens," Hakim had said.

Congress top leader Rahul Gandhi even went to the extent of calling the Prime Minister "panauti" or "ill omen", a term very much trendy on social media.

Addressing a rally in election-bound Rajasthan on Tuesday, Rahul accused PM Modi of trying to distract from the issues.

"He comes on TV and says 'Hindu-Muslim' and sometimes goes to a cricket match... Our boys would have won the World Cup but the panauti lost the match for us," he said in Hindi.

Responding to the same, senior BJP leader and former Union minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said the former Congress president's remarks about the Prime Minister were "shameful, condemnable and disgraceful".

Union Minister Rajeev Chandrashekar also hit out at Gandhi and said the comments were signs of desperation and mental instability.

In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Chandrashekar said Rahul Gandhi is now 55 years old and had never worked a day in his life, and whose family had "exploited the country like parasites".

 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.