July 19, 2026 01:07 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
NEET protest escalates! CJP demands PM Modi's resignation after Sonam Wangchuk's forceful removal | Chaos at Jantar Mantar! Woman throws ink at CJP chief Abhijeet Dipke; he replies 'Blue is my colour' | A historic new frontier': PM Modi hails India's first private orbital rocket Vikram-1 launch | Mission Aagaman takes off: India's first private orbital rocket Vikram-1 makes history | NEET protest explodes: CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke begins indefinite hunger strike after Sonam Wangchuk's forceful removal | Jantar Mantar Protest: Cops remove Sonam Wangchuk from protest site, admitted to hospital | India's Rail Revolution Begins: First Hydrogen train hits the tracks | Tragedy in Bengal: Two children among three killed as train hits school van | Europe's killer heatwave claims nearly 10,000 lives, UN sounds global alarm | 'Why introduce a new language in Class 9?' Supreme Court questions Centre's policy
College Romance
Image Credit: TVFPlay website

'Had to use earphones': Delhi HC judge slams 'obscene' OTT web series College Romance

| @indiablooms | Mar 08, 2023, at 04:57 am

New Delhi/IBNS: A web series named 'College Romance' was in the spotlight as the Delhi High Court Monday reprimanded its sexually explicit language that could corrupt impressionable minds as the content was widely available.

The court backed an earlier order to file an FIR against the platform and its actors.

"College Romance", streaming on the OTT platform TVF, has obscene, lascivious, and profane content, the High Court observed, asking the government to take measures to check the language on such platforms.

"The power of obscenity and sexual explicitness of language used in this web series... cannot be undermined and it has a definite effect of depraving and corrupting the minds of people, especially the impressionable minds," said Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma.

The judge said she found the language "so obscene and vulgar" that she had to use earphones to watch episodes.

"The court had to watch the episodes with the aid of earphones, in the chamber, as the profanity of language used was of the extent that it could not have been heard without shocking or alarming the people around and keeping in mind the decorum of language which is maintained by a common prudent man whether in the professional or public domain or even with family members at home," the judgment said.

"Most certainly, this court notes that this is not the language that nation's youth or otherwise citizens of this country use, and this language cannot be called the frequently spoken language used in our country," it said.

The judge said the makers of the series should face action under Section 67 which deals with "lascivious" content and 67 (A) related to publishing or spreading sexually explicit content. But the direction to file an FIR does not include a direction to arrest anyone.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.