July 04, 2026 11:15 pm (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
'Why can't citizens protest against the government? They are being made slaves by slapping cases': Bombay HC slams Mumbai Police, quashes activist's externment | 'First he cheats on me...': Siya Goyal's old pub video goes viral amid probe into fiancé Ketan Agarwal's alleged murder | Ronaldo's goal, Ramos' last-gasp winner send Portugal past Croatia, set up Spain clash | India-US trade deal almost done! Piyush Goyal hints at breakthrough | Ram Mandir donation scam: Champat Rai points finger at his own driver | PM Modi welcomes Japanese PM Sanae Takaichi as India-Japan ties enter a new era | 'Not an isolated incident': India slams Pakistan after 125-year-old historic Gurdwara is demolished | Ram Mandir donation theft: Six accused were employed by Varanasi-based security firm, probe reveals | Ayodhya Ram Temple donation theft: Probe says majority of money was allegedly stolen during Kumbh Mela | Commercial LPG price slashed by Rs 183.50 from July 1; check new rates in Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai

Defamation case: Kejriwal appears in court after judge slams his absence

| | Mar 18, 2015, at 12:41 am
New Delhi, Mar 16 (IBNS): Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal along with Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia and AAP leader Yogendra Yadav on Tuesday appeared before a Delhi court in connection with a defamation case, after receiving a flak from the judge for not appearing for the hearing.
This comes after they were directed by the court to appear in connection with the criminal defamation case.
 
As Kejriwal and others remained absent even after being summoned, Metropolitan Magistrate Mayuri Singh said they "have no respect for the law".
 
The court has now fixed May 2, for pronouncing order on framing of charges against Kejriwal, Sisodia and Yadav in the case.
 
The trio had earlier sought an exemption from personal appearances for the hearing, citing lawyers' strike. 
 
However, the court slammed the move, stating that no reason was given for their absence from the hearing.
 
This was the first time after the rift within AAP came to light that Kejriwal, Sisodia met Yadav. 
 
The complainant, advocate Surender Kumar Sharma, opposed the plea of exemption stating the lawyers are on strike and not the litigants and it would not be in the interest of justice if any adjournment is given in the case as the case had earlier been adjourned three times due to absence of the accused, said reports.
 
Sharma had alleged that in 2013 he was approached by volunteers of AAP who had asked him to contest the Delhi Assembly elections on a party ticket. They reportedly said Kejriwal was pleased with his social services.
 
He had then filled up the application form to contest the polls after being told by Sisodia and Yadav that party's Political Affairs Committee (PAC) had decided to give him the ticket. 
 
However, it was later denied to him.
 
Sharma had claimed that articles in leading newspapers carried "defamatory, unlawful and derogatory words used by the accused persons" which thereby lowered his reputation in the Bar and the society. 

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.