August 15, 2026 02:15 am (IST)
Follow us:
facebook-white sharing button
twitter-white sharing button
instagram-white sharing button
youtube-white sharing button
Ajit Doval breaks silence on Operation Sindoor in Discovery’s explosive new docuseries | Rahul Gandhi's 'mock hug' taunt sparks row; Centre stresses 'mutual respect' with Italy | Delhi on high alert: Bomb threat to High Court, airport and multiple locations ahead of I-Day | ‘Who are they to interfere?’: CJI Surya Kant slams Bar Council of India over NALSAR students’ enrolment row | 'Shows how low Congress has sunk': BJP slams Rahul Gandhi over Modi foreign policy jibe | From guns to glamour: Former women Maoists walk the ramp in Chhattisgarh | Netaji row: Suvendu Adhikari govt strips BJP MP Anant Maharaj of state honour | Sukhbir Badal attacked by Nihang Sikh with kirpan at Maharashtra gurdwara; assailant detained | ‘If you cannot do it, we will pass an order’: Supreme Court’s final warning to Centre on food labels | ‘Time to move on’: Bombay HC sends strong message in Vijay Mallya-bank dispute
COVID-19 | PCR Test
Image credit: Unsplash

Scientists propose cheaper mass PCR testing method sans kits: COVID Research

| @indiablooms | Dec 03, 2021, at 01:26 am

London/UNI/Sputnik: A group of Singaporean and British scientists has proposed a scalable cheap alternative to the existing PCR testing method using kits to increase the availability of timely and uninterrupted COVID testing in lower income countries, according to research published in the journal 'Nature'.

The aim of the research was to demonstrate how a kit-less method of PCR testing can be widely applied using hospital and laboratory infrastructure already in place.

Its adoption will ensure that mass testing in future epidemics will not be compromised by the unavailability or unaffordability of RNA extraction kits needed for tests, which are currently patented and supplied by a handful of major manufacturers.

To avoid shortages of PCR testing kits, essential for diagnosing viral diseases such as the arboviruses, hepatitis viruses and HIV, the technology has to be readily available to generic suppliers and local laboratories.

"Here we demonstrate that a well-established, TRIzol-based, non-kit RNA extraction protocol can be adapted into a semi-automated, high-throughput format using equipment readily available in research and hospital laboratories," the research said.

Biological samples are placed into a PCR plate, where the RNA is automatically extracted by liquid handlers using a modified TRIzol-based method, after which a standard qPCR-based detection is used to analyze the virus. A complete run of 96 samples takes four hours, according to the study.

The cost per one sample was estimated at a range from $5 to $16, depending on local prices for materials.

In comparison, the majority of coronavirus tests currently available on the market can cost from $50 to over $1,000, depending on the country and the time until results are ready.

Support Our Journalism

We cannot do without you.. your contribution supports unbiased journalism

IBNS is not driven by any ism- not wokeism, not racism, not skewed secularism, not hyper right-wing or left liberal ideals, nor by any hardline religious beliefs or hyper nationalism. We want to serve you good old objective news, as they are. We do not judge or preach. We let people decide for themselves. We only try to present factual and well-sourced news.

Support objective journalism for a small contribution.